Chowhound Presents: Table Talk with Yotam Ottolenghi and Helen Goh of Sweet: Desserts from London's Ottolenghi | Ask Your Questions Now ›

Food Media

Ruth Reichl Talk at Princeton Last Night


Food Media 3

Ruth Reichl Talk at Princeton Last Night

brownie | Mar 7, 2007 08:28 AM

She gave a talk called "Watch What You Eat." I don't know where else she's given the talk, so perhaps some of you have heard it before... Her thesis was basically that in cultures like Rome, Greece, early-Medieval Islam, Medieval China, Medieval thru Renaissance thru Enlightenment France and England(mostly) and the US from, say, the 30s-present, there's been an arc in how meat is presented and eaten. At first, these cultures serve big, often enormous, portions of meat, which is generally presented with heads on, obvious limbs displayed, etc, that is to say, there's no disguising that the food was very recently a living creature. These feast get more and more epic in proportion as time goes by. Then, as the middle class rises and expands, and has more access not only to meat but to larger portions of it, the richest have to change the way in which they eat meat. Soon, meats are no longer presented with heads on, but rather are chopped, minced, spiced, reshaped and otherwise altered to look nothing like the creatures they once were. One example she showed was a dish from the Islamic world which was minced meat, shaped into a lemon form, covered with a golden (from saffron) wash, and presented to look like a citrus fruit, a very fancy kofte. Now, instead of looking like an animal, meat looks like something completely different. Her modern equivalent of this was, not surprisingly, Ferran Adria's creations. Of course, her other point was that once these cultures reach the fancy meat in disguise level, they often crash and burn--Rome, Louis XVI, and so forth. She didn't really make that conclusion specifically for the US or Western Europe, but she certainly hinted at it. It was an interesting talk, not that I'm sure I agree entirely with her premise once you bring it to today. What do you all think?

On another note, and something i found hilarious (tho that was not her intention): in the Q&A, someone asked a question about Gourmet and making it more populist. She said, well, that's really been my goal, to not have lots of articles about fancy cruises and expensive destinations. Or, as I thought to myself elaborate dinner parties with expensive ingredients or kitchen gadgets and equipment that costs $10,000. Right... I know, if I want to read about cheaper stuff and trips I could actually afford, I could read blogs and CH postings. My friend and I turned to each other and said: and the magazine is less elitist now how?? Sure those trips could be done on a less elaborate budget, but we can't even really afford to fly to Dalmatia (or wherever) in the first place... Oh well, that's what a good food safari to Queens is all about ;)

Want to stay up to date with this post?

Recommended From Chowhound