Pasta & Stock Cooking Science--Tall Pot Necessary?


Cookware 8

Pasta & Stock Cooking Science--Tall Pot Necessary?

MaggieRSN | Dec 3, 2007 08:52 PM

Every reference I've checked says to use a tall stockpot w/an insert, or a pasta pot, with a 5- to 6-quart capacity, to cook a pound of pasta.

I understand the pasta needs sufficient room to move around freely, but why do so many sources say the pot should be taller than wide?

Asking because I bought a (wider than tall) stewpot today whose volume is actually half a quart or so larger than the taller stockpot I have, but don't love.

I'd like to donate the stockpot, since the volume of the two pots is nearly the same, unless cooking pasta or stocks would *noticeably* suffer. Eventually, I'll probably look for a new stockpot, too, but why wouldn't this suffice for the interim?

Want to stay up to date with this post?

Recommended From Chowhound