The NYC Food Myths thread, particularly Tater's comment about H&H bagels and many of the deli comments, leads me to this: in many cases the "ideal" that some folks are discussing bears only a distant resemblance to the "ideal" that those with deep, long-term familiarity have with that thing.
When the bagel's demise began (early 70s?), my mother used to say that bagels changed because lots of people didn't find the old-time small chewy dense bagels as tempting as the big, fluffy, stuffed bagels you get almost everywhere now. So for a person who never had the old style and might not even like it, how can you suggest an ideal?
I find this true of myself when people oooh and aaah over junk food (see KFC thread a while back). I can't even imagine the ideal because the whole process/experience is anathema to my approach.
Also as a native NYer living upstate, I look at the Tristate postings sometimes with dismay because the standards for, say, a piece of bread or sushi, are vastly different here than NYC, and I feel sometimes that if I post my real opinion about upstate stuff, which is that it usually doesn't meet a very good standard, I'm ruining all the fun. And in a few years, maybe I'll forget what the really good stuff was really like.
That said, I do think it's possible to define some ideals because they taste, smell, and ARE better, great pizza being a good candidate for this.
by Dan Koday | Pale pink in color, rosé looks pretty divine submerged in a half-melted ice bucket drenched by sunlight...
by Maryse Chevriere | Poor wine. Beloved as you are, you never can seem to completely shake the nagging stereotype that...
Sign up for our newsletter to receive the latest tips, tricks, recipes and more, sent twice a week.