Site Feedback

Dealing with star ratings


Live your best food life.

Sign up to discover your next favorite restaurant, recipe, or cookbook in the largest community of knowledgeable food enthusiasts.
Sign Up For Free
Site Feedback 8

Dealing with star ratings

rworange | Jan 13, 2010 10:18 AM

I know there are many Chowhounds that don't like the star ratings and don't use them.

One of the arguments is that a restaurant may have nothing but swill on the menu but one spectacular dish may be the reason that restaurant deserves to exist.

My own personal reservation is the cumulative nature. A restaurant that may start out five stars, does a downhill nosedive but those great reports keep it with a high star rating ... or visa versa owners, new chef, etc.

I also would have preferred a rating on a scale of 1-10. This is a frequent complaint on yelp. Sometimes a restaurant is 3 1/2 stars and there is no way to do that. A 1-10 scale would be better.

That hs been my struggle ... what to do with a place that is 8 on a scale from 1-10.

I've finally gotten a grip on this and use this system.

1 star - don't bother.
2 stars - below average
3 stars - average
4 stars - above average
5 stars - destination worthy

For some reason this just makes it easier for me to rate. I do think rating is important. Not everyone is a Chowhound and if we want our favorites to live, giving a rating might just push more business to a particular restaurant.

As to the one dish wonder. I rate it five stars. There's a place recently with spectacular Israli mint lemanade and I gave it five stars. I did note in my report the reason for those five stars was based on the lemonade.

Any opinions?

Want to stay up to date with this post?