Chowhound Presents: Table Talk with Yotam Ottolenghi and Helen Goh of Sweet: Desserts from London's Ottolenghi | Ask Your Questions Now ›

Restaurants & Bars


Alto review / Comparison with l'Impero


Restaurants & Bars 3

Alto review / Comparison with l'Impero

rrems | Nov 17, 2007 01:12 PM

Had dinner at Alto last night. I was very eager to try it in order to compare with our very satisfying experience at l'Impero. It turned out to be quite pleasant overall, but I really prefer l'Impero. We were seated in one of the small upstairs rooms, which was comfortable and quiet, compared to the somewhat cramped downstairs which also seemed noisy. The decor is not as sterile as I had been led to expect, but lacked the warmth that I felt at l'Impero. We had the 4-course dinner, starting with partridge sausage (excellent) and mushroom soup (very good), then the duck tortellini (good) and the agnolotti with rabbit (very good). We enjoyed these as much as the first and pasta courses at l'Impero. The main courses, though also very good, were not as interesting. The rack of lamb was not as good as l'Impero's loin and sausage and the venison was as good as farm-raised venison gets, but at l'Impero we had guinea fowl with a liver sauce which was really wonderful. No guinea fowl on the menu at Alto. Desserts were also pretty much equal at both places, good though not spectacular. The prix fixe is $82 at Alto, $64 at l'Impero. I feel the difference is not warranted. Alto emphasizes northern Italian food, l'Impero southern, and my sense is Alto is fancier while l'Impero is a bit more rustic, more similar to Babbo which is also among my favorites. For overall value and satisfaction, I will be much more inclined to return to l'Impero than to Alto. Nonetheless, I would place both among the top Italian restaurants in Manhattan.

Want to stay up to date with this post?

Recommended From Chowhound