(Re-posting this on the Midwest board so that Cincinnati diners see it). The link to the original: http://www.chowhound.com/topics/393804. Post your feedback there, if you can.)
Pittsburgh and Cincinnati diners--
This week, I was having a debate between the various dining scenes in Cincinnati (my home) and Pittsburgh (my friend's home). We were trying to decide how to describe each city's strengths and weaknesses in dining. We're both pretty "boundary-less" diners-- we'll happily eat great roadside grub and pub food, and also go to four-star restaurants (IF the quality is worth it!).
So, here's how I described Cincinnati's dining scene: great for cheap local food (chili parlors, barbeque), great for high-end dining (Pigall's, Boca, Nicola's, etc), OK for some kinds of ethnic (Indian, sushi), but pretty much lacking in the "middle range" of the spectrum.
And as for Pittsburgh, I heard: really good casual and bar food (brewing company), good Italian, some decent ethnic in certain neighborhoods, but not great for fine dining.
Problem is, neither one of us knows the other's city very well! Thought I'd put it out to the intelligencia of my fellow Hounds. My questions:
-Which city has the edge in Cuisine?
-What are the pros and cons in your mind?
-Finally, just to understand your tastes, what are your favorite dining spots in each town?
These cities are alike in so many respects, interested to see if the same is true of dining!
Updated 2 years ago | 5
Updated 1 year ago | 0
Updated 1 year ago | 6
Updated 1 year ago | 7
Updated 7 months ago | 0