The New York Times has opened up what I find to be a fascinating contest. The fundamental question is quite complex, though it can be asserted in a rather simple way: "Whether it is right to eat animals in the first place, at least when human survival is not at stake." Here is a link to the article which includes some clarification, the rules, the judges, and some thoughts (not always thoughtful or on point) from some NYT posters:
So, I'm curious. Anyone else find this to be an intriguing exercise? Anyone have any thoughts on the subject? Anyone else thinking of trying to submit an answer?
This post is locked.Have something new to say?Create a New Post
Updated 11 months ago | 24
Updated 1 year ago | 3
Updated 2 years ago | 17
Updated 5 months ago | 3
Updated 1 year ago | 0