The New York Times has opened up what I find to be a fascinating contest. The fundamental question is quite complex, though it can be asserted in a rather simple way: "Whether it is right to eat animals in the first place, at least when human survival is not at stake." Here is a link to the article which includes some clarification, the rules, the judges, and some thoughts (not always thoughtful or on point) from some NYT posters:
So, I'm curious. Anyone else find this to be an intriguing exercise? Anyone have any thoughts on the subject? Anyone else thinking of trying to submit an answer?