Slow cooker vs Rice cooker


Live your best food life.

Sign up to discover your next favorite restaurant, recipe, or cookbook in the largest community of knowledgeable food enthusiasts.
Sign Up For Free
Cookware 8

Slow cooker vs Rice cooker

balblua | Sep 25, 2010 08:05 AM

Hi everyone,

I'm looking for a new appliance for slow cooking / simmering large amounts of food.

I currently just have an 8cup rice cooker with Cook/Warm settings. It works fine for rice, but requires lots of babying to cook stews, make stock, & other wet dishes due to the lack of a "soup" mode.

I definitely need a second appliance. I want more convenience and the ability to I can cook rice and slow cook in parallel. The question is, what type? Ideally, I want a final setup that can cook meals for 4 adults. I also like to "fire and forget" when I cook, hence programmable timers are useful.

I see the following options:

(A0) Buy a rice cooker with a soup mode
(A1) Buy a fuzzy rice cooker with a soup mode
(B) Buy a slow cooker with a timer mode

(A*) Pros: more versatile wrt what it can cook. Also many useful cooking modes for Asian food, which is what I grew up eating.

- Hard to find one with programmable cooking timer for slow cook mode.
- A1 gets into a ridiculous price territory for a 10 cup model, which is the size that I need to comfortably cook enough food for company and to get enough leftovers when cooking for myself. I will cry the first time I scratch the pan.


Pros: I can find slow cookers with programmable cooking timers, much larger capacity, and a versatile form factor for serving. Stoneware is also more robust against abuse than a non-stick rice cooker.

Cons: implied above

The right strategy seems to be to buy a $50 slow cooker now. When I feel like it, buy a $100 5.5 cup rice cooker and donate my current rice cooker toa good cause.

Any advice & suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Want to stay up to date with this post?

Recommended From Chowhound