+
Wine

Another idiotic "cheap wine" story in Slate

jonasblank | Nov 2, 201102:18 PM     12

http://www.slate.com/articles/life/dr...

To save everyone some time, this rehashes the same tired following ideas:
- most people can't tell the difference between "cheap" and "expensive" wines
- the price of wines varies widely
- if you spend a lot of money on wine, you will spend a lot of money (a syllogism of breathtaking obviousness)

What I don't understand about these pieces is that wine is singled out, as if it is alone among products where some sort of "myths" must be "debunked" to spare the poor consumer from buying more expensive products.

In virtually every product category, a more expensive alternative exists whose attributes may not be that important to the "average" consumer. A few that immediately come to mind:

Clothes - $10 Target shirt vs. $500 Gucci shirt - Both still are shirts
Watch - a Rolex and a Timex keep time equally well
Car - Both a Chevy Aero and a Ferrari can drive at highway speeds
Restaurant Meal - Basic nutrition can be had for $12.99 per person at TGI Friday's, or $500+pp at French Laundry...
Golf clubs - I'm not really a golfer, but I understand you can spend $1000s on these
Audio - More like wine in that the improved attributes of the high-end products may be less obvious to some people

..and so on. Yet there are never articles that say, "Don't buy expensive clothes" or "don't go to expensive restaurants"? Yet it is no more obvious that if you don't really care about, say, watches, you probably shouldn't buy a Rolex. The degree to which the "better" product is "better" is only likely to matter to those who are heavy users of the product and who care more about them.

The fact that there are great bottles of wine that are inexpensive to very inexpensive is not exactly a secret. There are also some pretty amazing food experiences you can have for not much money, and unless you're Tiger Woods, you can probably play just about as good of golf with some cheap clubs as some more expensive ones. But it doesn't mean that ON AVERAGE the "more expensive" products aren't actually better in some ways, and it doesn't mean that the person for whom whatever difference in quality exists is wrong for perceiving, or indeed, enjoying that difference.

... ::end rant:: :)

Want to stay up to date with this post? Sign Up Now ›

More from Chowhound

10 Must-Buy Food Souvenirs You'll Want to Bring Back from France
Chow with Me

10 Must-Buy Food Souvenirs You'll Want to Bring Back from France

by Hana Asbrink | My latest haul. Welcome to Chow...

Chefs Share Their Favorite Summer Meat Marinades for Steak, Chicken, Shrimp & More
Guides

Chefs Share Their Favorite Summer Meat Marinades for Steak, Chicken, Shrimp & More

by Dan Koday | You ever notice how a great marinade can instantly elevate what otherwise would end up as a pretty...

Tokyo to Texas: Austin Chef Reflects on His Multicultural Upbringing
Spotlight

Tokyo to Texas: Austin Chef Reflects on His Multicultural Upbringing

by Eric Silverstein | By Eric Silverstein Chef Eric Silverstein is the founder and owner of The Peached Tortilla in Austin...

Foil Packets Are Your Best Camping Food Friend
Recipe Round-Ups

Foil Packets Are Your Best Camping Food Friend

by Joey Skladany | Going camping? Foil packets are the best way to cook your food (and they're pretty great in the oven...

See what's new!

View latest discussions ›

Get fresh food news delivered to your inbox

Sign up for our newsletter to receive the latest tips, tricks, recipes and more, sent twice a week.