Is it just me or is there something really weird about this review in yesterday's gazette. The critic spends a whole paragraph complaining that that red mullet has bones. HUH? How is that the restaurant's fault? AND they did warn her about it.
Was that a valid complaint?
here's the paragraph:
The red mullet failed for other reasons. Though the flesh had a pleasant taste similar to shrimp, it was a real bother to scoop it out amidst the many bones. To be fair, the waiter warned us that there would be work involved. But digging in with your hands and having to inspect every morsel of these three little fish is too much to ask of even the most intrepid fish lover. There must be some way to make red mullet more customer-friendly.