Restaurants & Bars

San Francisco Bay Area Indian

Differences between "upscale" Indian and "Tandoorloin"


Live your best food life.

Sign up to discover your next favorite restaurant, recipe, or cookbook in the largest community of knowledgeable food enthusiasts.
Sign Up For Free
Restaurants & Bars 22

Differences between "upscale" Indian and "Tandoorloin"

Alan C | Sep 29, 2004 07:45 PM

I've been wanting to post about this for some time, and was finally inspired to stop stalling by the thread a few lines below on Indian food in San Francisco.

Deb and I really got turned on to Indian food by posts on this board, and have regularly sampled Naan n Curry, all the Pakwans, Shalimar, Shah, etc., mostly for take-out meals.

I was driving out Clement and noticed the new "India Clay Oven" location. Inside the picture window you can see white tablecloths on the tables, and a sign mentioning the "full bar".

So my question is: Is the food better at such "upscale" locations, or is it PRIMARILY a matter of ambiance? For example, I really think the lamb chops at the Jones/O'Farrell Naan n Curry are fantastic. The "char" is great, the spiciness perfect; however I have often thought how amazing it might taste if the meat were somewhat thicker/jucier, and the cuts larger and more tender.

So we'd appreciate some feedback on the pros and cons of the "India Clay Ovens" vs. "Naan n Currys" of the world, and for that matter, anything in between the two.

Thanks Chowhounds.

Want to stay up to date with this post?

Recommended From Chowhound