I was just reading a biography of Clementine Paddleford, who was one of the first food writers in America to collect a large following (mostly 1930s-1950s, I guess). It's interspersed with recipes, and my attention was caught by this for lamb stew (condensed by me):
Generously season with salt/pepper 2 pounds of lamb shoulder cut into chunks, toss with flour and brown in hot oil. Pour on 3/4 cup of boiling water to nearly cover, and simmer for an hour and a half. Add a turnip, carrot, and onion, all died, and cook for 3-4 minutes, Ad a largely diced potato and cook for 6 more minutes.
Since I'm not a particularly skilled cook, my initial reaction was, Hey, I could do this. But then I thought, Hm, it's really a different approach than I'd expect, even someone unskilled like me. I'd have expected to brown the lamb, then add the onion, then a splash of wine, then probably stock instead of water, plus herbs/spices. Then I'd cut the vegetables in larger chunks and add them earlier, so that they'd cook for about a half-hour.
I guess that we expect more complexity now? Or what do you think?
This is the book, if you're curious:
http://www.penguin.com/book/hometown-...
by Jen Wheeler | Need a spring vegetable guide to what's in season? Consider this your spring produce cheat sheet—complete...
by Rachel Johnson | Whether the kids are still distance learning or returning to a classroom, with school back in session...
by Kelly Magyarics | You’ve sprung for a gorgeous piece of enameled cast iron cookware; protect your investment by cleaning...
by Debbie Wolfe | Home chefs love wood cutting boards because they are durable and reliable. Wood boards are attractive...
Sign up for our newsletter to receive the latest tips, tricks, recipes and more, sent twice a week.
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.