I just read the 2009 New Yorker article about one of Michelin's NYC inspectors:
In it, the inspector says their rating is "just technical. I mean, cooking is a science, and either it’s right or it’s wrong. And that’s something that’s very objective. Either a sauce is prepared accurately—or it’s not. A fish is cooked accurately—or it’s not."
Is having a well-developed French palate (i.e., you know all the sauces, cooking techniques, major ingredients) sufficient to judge the goodness of Chinese food for a Chinese audience? Is having a well-developed Chinese palate sufficient to judge French food for a French audience?
If you're someone who happily eats both, do you turn off one part of your brain when you're eating Chinese and the other when you're eating French?
I was just reading Thai Chef McDang's rant on how Michelin gave stars to two "Thai restaurants" run by non-Thais who don't treat rice as a central part of their cooking, which is apparently anathema to Thai cuisine.
I know that Michelin sells well in Japan, but I've heard a lot of crabbing about their guides for China (including HK/Macau).
Have they made any official statements on how exactly they're going about judging Chinese food?
If this is written up somewhere, can someone point me in the right direction?
Updated 29 days ago | 7
Updated 2 days ago | 8
Updated 5 days ago | 8
Updated 3 months ago | 4
Updated 3 days ago | 21